Montes v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
52 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably Malcolm v. State (1993), Drinkard v. Walker (2006)
52 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Estevez · Haynes v. State · Keener v. State · Rhodes v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Ajpplying the “actual evidence” test of our substantive double jeopardy provisions, see OCGA §§ 16-1-7 (a), 16-1-6, we find that [appellant’s] conviction for [aggravated assault of the deceased victim] must be set aside. The “actual evidence” test, in effect, means “ ‘that if the state uses up all the evidence that the defendant committed one crime in establishing another crime, the former crime is included in the latter as a matter of fact under . . . OCGA § 16-1-6 (1).’ ””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Garrett v. State · Jordan v. State“established by the same but less than all of the facts required to establish”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“a series of shots fired in quick succession . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hayes v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.