Mize v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 2013
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Harley-Davidson Motor Co. v. Daniel · Mays v. Daniels · 170 Ga. App. 505 - State v. Waters · Tendler v. Thompson · 135 Ga. App. 620 - Parker v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hether jurors are impaneled during a term of court is relevant... to whether that term will be counted as one of the two regular terms of court, after the term when the demand for trial is entered, during which subsection (b) of OCGA § [17-7-170] requires the state to give the defendant a trial or an absolute discharge and acquittal after an appropriate demand for such has been filed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Williamson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.