Kumar v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently July 2015
2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 12131 (§ 201 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on Tuten v. City of Brunswick · 150 Ga. App. 234 - Lowe v. Pue · Lambeth v. State · 183 Ga. App. 103 - Chapman v. Burks · 156 Ga. App. 28 - Tri-Cities Hospital Authority v. Sheats
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[I]n no event may an action for medical malpractice be brought by or on behalf of: "(1) A person who is legally incompetent because of mental retardation or mental illness more than five years after the date on which the negligent or wrongful act or omission occurred!)]””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.