Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 262 Ga. 73 - Maxwell v. State

Maxwell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

76
cited by 76 later decisions
4
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

76 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently October 2015 · most notably Wall v. State (1998), Pye v. State (1998)

76 state decisions

600199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lockhart v. Nelson · Williams v. State · Smith v. State · Gunter v. State · Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Saul

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Before evidence of prior difficulties or quarrels can be presented to a jury, the trial court must conduct a hearing pursuant to Uniform Superior Court Rule 31.3(B) just as it must do with respect to independent offenses or acts.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Uniform Superior Court Rule 31.1 requires the [S]tate to provide defendant with notice of its intent to present evidence of similar transactions or occurrences, including evidence of prior difficulties between defendant and the victim, at least ten days before trial, unless the trial court lengthens or shortens the notice time. [Cit.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “should be received with care and should not be admitted at all if there is no probative connection with the present case....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.