Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 262 Ind. 134 - Garr v. State

Garr v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
September 1983
most recently cited

28 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden · Parker v. State · Patterson v. State · Taylor v. State · Garr v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . We would also observe in passing that although it is desirable to first establish a corpus delicti before showing a confession or statements against interest by the defendant, such is not necessary. The matter of order of proof is within the sound discretion of the trial court. See: Parker v. State (1949), 228 Ind. 1, 12 , 89 N.E.2d 442 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““. . . There is no question but what a police officer may arrest a suspect without a warrant when he has probable cause to believe that a felony has been committed by the person arrested. Patterson v. State (1970), 253 Ind. 499 , 255 N.E.2d 520 , 20 Ind. Dec. 290 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.