Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 262 Ind. 183 - Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
1
states following
August 1992
most recently cited

45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently August 1992 · most notably Ballard v. State (1974), Roberts v. State (1975)

45 state decisions

320197419801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chimel v. California · Pokraka v. Lummus Co. · Langley v. State · Kiefer v. State · Brown v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The State in its answer brief on appeal makes persuasive arguments that each of the grounds for relief, relied upon by appellant in the trial proceedings has been waived. [citations omitted] But here, the trial judge, in his findings and conclusions, ignored the issues and evidence of waiver proffered by the State, and instead found that the appellant had failed in his burden of proof. Since the trial judge did not find a waiver to have occurred, and further since the State did not file cross-errors on appeal alleging that the trial court erred in failing to make special findings and conclusions on the issue of waiver, we cannot base our decision here upon waiver principle. Langley v. State, [(1971), 256 Ind. 199 , 267 N.E.2d 538 ].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““. . . in order for new evidence to warrant the vacation of a conviction it should be sufficiently material and decisive as to give rise to a strong likelihood that its presentation in a new trial would cause a different result to be reached. . . .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Johnson v. State (1974), 262 Ind. 183 , 313 N.E.2d 542 ; Dixon v. State (1972), 154 Ind. App. 603 , 290 N.E.2d 731 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.