Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 262 Ind. 403 - Marshall v. Reeves

Marshall v. Reeves’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
2
states following
September 1997
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 48 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently September 1997 · most notably Orr v. Turco Manufacturing Co. (1987), Royal Business Machines, Inc. v. Lorraine Corp. (1980)

3 federal appellate · 48 state decisions

330197419801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Marks v. Bremmer · Vandalia Railroad v. Walsh

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"If the court on appeal affirms the judgment, damages may be assessed in favor of the appellee not exceeding ten per cent (10%) upon the judgment, in money judgments, and in other cases in the discretion of the court; and the court shall remand such cause for execution."”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"A discretionary award of damages is proper where an appeal is frivolous, or without substance or merit. Further, a penalty may be assessed where an appeal is taken merely to harass or delay the appellee, 'thus presenting an illustration of vexatious litigation, that crowds our courts to the detriment of meritorious action, and which should not go unre-buked.' [Citations omitted.]"”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “is frivolous, or without substance or merit.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.