Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 262 Ind. 405 - Cooper v. High

Cooper v. High’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently March 2010 · most notably Dayton Walther Corp. v. Caldwell (1980), Bituminous Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Culligan Fyrprotexion, Inc. (1982)

30 state decisions

18019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Robertson Bros. Dept. Store v. Stanley · Baker v. Mason · 155 Ind. App. 582 - Rondinelli v. Bowden · 146 Ind. App. 666 - Lloyd v. Weimert · 155 Ind. App. 316 - Wallace v. Doan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““No evidence was presented at the trial as to the attorneys[’] fees, trial preparation or court costs. It would have been improper, therefore, for the trial court to give this instruction. . . . ” (Our insertion) * * * * * *”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The reasonable expense of necessary medical care, treatment, and services [and the reasonable expense of future medical care, treatment, and services].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “in accord with the Indiana policy of allowing the necessary and reasonable expenses for medical attention, medicine and nursing”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.