Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 262 Kan. 194 - Roark v. Graves

Roark v. Graves’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
July 2006
most recently cited

4 district · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Turner v. Safley · Thornburgh v. Abbott · Workers' Compensation Insurers Rating Ass'n v. Austin Products Co. · Dickerson v. Kansas Department of Revenue · State v. Durrant

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Assessing fees to offenders is based on a belief that offenders should be accountable for their actions, and contributing to the costs of incarceration or supervision are important components of establishing that accountability.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The secretary of corrections is hereby authorized to adopt rules and regulations under which offenders in the secretary’s custody may be assessed fees for various services provided to offenders and for deductions for payment to the crime victims compensation fund.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.