State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 2013
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Valentine
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““K.S.A. 21-4721(d)(l) requires an evidentiary test — are the facts stated by the sentencing court in justification of departure supported by the record? K.S.A. 21-4721(d)(2) requires a law test — are the reasons stated on the record for departure adequate to justify a sentence outside the presumptive sentence?” State v. Davis, 262 Kan. 711, 714 , 941 P.2d 946 (1997).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Bailey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.