Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 262 Kan. 769 - Biritz v. Williams

Biritz v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 8 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently February 2016

2 federal appellate · 8 district · 7 state decisions

130199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Martindale v. Tenny · Bacon v. Mercy Hosp. of Ft. Scott · Equity Investors, Inc. v. Academy Insurance Group, Inc. · City of Wichita v. 200 South Broadway, Ltd. Partnership · Patterson v. Brouhard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A cause of action arising out of the rendering of or the failure to render professional services by a health care provider shall be deemed to have accrued at the time of the occurrence of the act giving rise to the cause of action, unless the fact of injury is not reasonably ascertainable until some time after the initial act, then the period of limitation shall not commence until the fact of injury becomes reasonably ascertainable to the injured party, but in no event shall such an action be commenced more than four years beyond the time of the act giving rise to the cause of action.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““[I]f any person entitled to bring an action, other than for the recovery of real property or a penalty or a forfeiture, at the time the cause of action accrued or at any time during the period the statute of limitations is running, is less than 18 years of age, . . . such person shall be entitled to bring such action within one year after the person’s disability is removed . . . .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.