Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 262 Mich. 236 - Anderson v. Schust Co.

Anderson v. Schust Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
July 1942
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Bayfield · Loux v. Harris · Eberle Brewing Co. v. Briscoe Motor Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The true rule is that for a positive wrong by a servant beyond the scope of the master’s business intentionally or recklessly done, the master cannot be held liable. Such acts may constitute personal torts of the servant, but the master is not responsible.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.