Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 262 Mich. 529 - People v. Koukol

People v. Koukol’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
March 2005
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 2005

7 state decisions

3019331940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Jennes · Hamilton v. People · People v. Hall · People v. Hare · Alderman v. People

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Where one under indictment takes the witness stand, he waives his constitutional privilege against self-incrimination, and is subject to the same rule of cross-examination as any other witness, and cannot shield himself from making a full and fair disclosure of all the facts of which he has knowledge upon the ground his answers may tend to incriminate him. People v. Dupounce, 133 Mich. 1 ( 103 Am. St. Rep. 435 , 2 Ann. Cas. 246).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.