Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 262 MO 158 - State v. Fields

State v. Fields’s Empirical Analysis

1914

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
May 1973
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 1973

11 state decisions

501914192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Concelia · State v. Long

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rule ... is that before this court aa7H1 relieve on the ground that the verdict is not supported by the evidence, there must be either a total failure of evidence, or it must be so weak that the necessary inference is that the verdict is the result of passion, prejudice or partiality. ’ ’”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.