State v. Curtright’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2 district · 26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently February 2021 · most notably State v. Lotter (2003), State v. Becerra (2002)
2 district · 26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Roe, Warden v. Flores-Ortega · State v. Hess · United States of America v. Mark Douglas Poehlman · State v. Thomas · State v. Hunt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because the bill of exceptions from the trial would have been useful only to assess claimed trial errors, the evaluation of which were procedurally barred, the district court did not err in these postconviction proceedings in denying Curtright’s motion to order the preparation of a bill of exceptions of the trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ortiz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.