262 N.J. Super. 294 - State v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Relies on Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A. · 255 N.J. Super. 108 - Fleming v. UPS · State of NJ v. Imperiale · 221 N.J. Super. 219 - State v. Cantor · State of NJ v. Kinder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Appearance of Prosecution. Whenever in his or her judgment the interests of justice so require, or upon the request of the court, the Attorney General, county prosecutor, municipal court prosecutor, or municipal attorney, as the case may be, may appear in any court on behalf of the State, or of the municipality, and conduct the prosecution of any action, but if the Attorney General, county or municipal court prosecutor, or municipal attorney does not appear, any attorney may appear on behalf of any complaining witness and prosecute the action for and on behalf of the State or the municipality. [M]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Individuals can and do utilize such criminal proceedings to bolster a related civil proceeding or merely for vindictive or harassing purposes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.