Carlson v. Rysavy’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
1 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 2005
1 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ehlers v. Chrysler Motor Corporation · State Ex Rel. Helgerson v. Riiff · 70 Wis. 2d 760 - Mulvaney v. Tri State Truck & Auto Body, Inc. · W & W Livestock Enterprises, Inc. v. Dennler · Cox Motor Car Company v. Castle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This court has long held that whether or not expert opinion testimony should be permitted on a particular subject as well as the qualifications and competency of the proffered witness to give opinion evidence, is primarily in the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed unless there is no evidence that the witness had qualifications of an expert or the trial court has proceeded upon erroneous legal standards.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Flagtwet v. Smith“in as good a position as if the other party had fully performed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]o make uniform the law among the various jurisdictions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.