State v. Hamann’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently March 2018
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Brady v. United States · McMann v. Richardson · McCarthy v. United States · Henderson v. Morgan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Although we have said that this court is not compelled to interpret state procedural rules derived from federal rules in the same fashion as federal courts, we have observed that such decisions are highly persuasive.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. St. Aubbin v. Nelson““In the absence of an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court, its decision to deny defendant’s motion to withdraw her guilty plea will stand.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Werre“[A]n approved plea bargaining agreement has qualities similar to that of a contract.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Parshall v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.