Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 262 N.W.2d 752 - Larson v. Locken

Larson v. Locken’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
7
states following
September 2004
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently September 2004 · most notably K & E Land and Cattle, Inc. v. Mayer (1983), In Re Canvass of Absentee Ballots of Nov. 4, 2003 General Election (2004)

28 state decisions

1301978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sommerfeld v. Board of Canvassers · State Highway Commission v. Beets · Bean v. Best · Bell v. Gannaway · Green v. Independent Consolidated School District No. 1

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No mere informality in the matter of carrying out or executing the provisions of this chapter shall invalidate the election or authorize the rejection of the returns thereof, and the provisions of this chapter shall be liberally construed for the purposes herein expressed or intended.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “That so far as the acts and duties of the elector are concerned, he must substantially comply with the requirements of the election statutes if he is to cast a valid ballot; on the other hand, he should not be disfranchised by the mere negligence or omissions of election officials; and that the election statutes so far as the acts and duties of such officials are concerned, should be held to be directory unless otherwise expressly declared by statute, or it is made to appear that such acts and conduct affected the merits of the election and prevented an honest and free expression of the will of the voters. (Emphasis added.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “As a general rule, the statutory directions to the voter with respect to the time and manner of making application for an absentee ballot, the manner of marking the same, the taking of the prescribed affidavit, and the return of the ballot, together with the affidavit, are regarded as mandatory and strict compliance therewith is required. These provisions deal with the statutory requirements that a voter must follow in order to be eligible to cast an absentee ballot. The voter has absolute control over these activities and it is incumbent on him to make sure that this procedure is followed to insure a valid vote.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.