Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 262 ORAPP 206 - State v. Rodriguez-Perez

State v. Rodriguez-Perez’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “" Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution does not forbid an officer to take reasonable steps to protect himself or others if, during the course of a lawful encounter with a citizen, the officer develops a reasonable suspicion, based upon specific and articulable facts, that the citizen might pose an immediate threat of serious physical injury to the officer or to others then present."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"(1) the officer's actions must have occurred during a lawful encounter; (2) the officer must have had a reasonable suspicion that the individual posed an immediate threat of serious physical injury; and (3) the steps the officer took to protect the officer or others must have been reasonable."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “facts specific to the particular person searched, not on intuition or a generalized fear that the person may pose a threat to the officer's safety.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.