State v. Durando’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"The erroneous exclusion or admission of evidence is harmless 'if the particular issue to which the error pertains has no relationship to the jury's determination of its verdict,' Davis , 336 Or. at 32 , 77 P.3d 1111 ***, or if the jury 'would have regarded the *** evidence as duplicative or unhelpful to its deliberations,' id ., at 33, 77 P.3d 1111 ***."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 291 Or. App. 496 - State v. Warren

2. “that the error affected the jury's verdict. State v. Davis , 336 Or. 19 , 32, 77 P.3d 1111 (2003).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 291 Or. App. 496 - State v. Warren