Ex parte Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
1953
Citation profile
1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently August 1979
1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Roberts v. Reilly · Arthur Appleyard v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Holman Drew v. Harry Kendall Thaw · 34 Cal. App. 344 - In Re Whittington · 37 Cal. App. 571 - In Re Thurber
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In 13 A.L.R. 415 the rule is thus stated: “ ‘The decided weight of authority is to the effect that the mission, motive, or -purpose inducing a person accused of being a fugitive from justice to leave the demanding state is immaterial, and that the courts of any asylum state will not consider such elements in an extradition proceeding, but will be satisfied by a simple showing that, having within the demanding state committed that which by its laws constitutes a crime, when the alleged fugitive is sought to be subjected to its criminal process to answer for his offense, he has voluntarily left its jurisdiction and is found within the asylum state.’ “To the same effect is 22 Am.Jur., Extradition, Sec. 23. “Decisions from most of the states in the Union, including Oklahoma, are cited in support of this majority rule. In 35 C.J.S., Extradition § 10, p. 327, it is said: “ ‘The mode or manner of a person’s departure from the state generally does not affect his status as a fugitive from justice; so the fact that a person’s departure was involuntary or under legal compulsion will not, under most authorities, preclude his extradition as a fugitive from justice’. “Oklahoma first became committed to the majority rule in the early case of Ex parte Williams, 10 Okl.Cr. 344 , 136 P. 597 , 51 L.R.A.,N.S., 668, in which it was held: “ ‘(a) To be a fugitive from justice under the laws of the United States, it is not necessary that the person charged with haying left the state in which the cr”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.