M.E.W. v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2023
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State Ex Rel. B.R. · State ex rel. K.F. v. State · T.M. v. State · State Ex Rel. Sl · State v. A.C.M.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In re B.R., 2007 UT 82, ¶ 12 , 171 P.3d 435 . Mother next claims that the juvenile court failed to consider or give proper weight to other factors. However, as in her first argument, Mother simply challenges the interpretation and emphasis of the juvenile court. We will overturn the juvenile court's decision”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The juvenile court may, by order, change the custody, subject to Subsection 30-3-10(4), [1] support, parent-time, and visitation rights previously ordered in the district court as necessary to implement the order of the juvenile court for the safety and welfare of the child.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“If the court determines that reunification services are appropriate, it shall order that the division make reasonable efforts to provide services to the minor and the minor's parent for the purpose of facilitating reunification of the family, for a specified period of time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.