D.B. v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
July 2011
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 438 Main Street v. Easy Heat, Inc. · State ex rel. K.F. v. State · Phone Directories Co., Inc. v. Henderson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whenever it appears to the court that a person who is not the parent, guardian or custodian should be made subject to the jurisdiction and authority of the court in a minor's case, upon motion of any party or the court's own motion, the court may issue a summons ordering such person to appear. Upon the appearance of such person, the court may enter an order making such person a party to the proceeding and may order such person to comply with reasonable conditions as part of the disposition of the minor's case. Upon the request of such person, the court shall conduct a hearing upon the issue of whether such person should be made a party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Utah Code section 78A-6-103(1)(c) provides that the juvenile court has exclusive jurisdiction in proceedings concerning a minor who has been abused, neglected, or is dependent. Before such proceedings may commence, the State must file a petition with the juvenile court that not only alleges that the minor has been abused, neglected, or is dependent, but also supports that allegation with "a concise statement of facts, separately stated." In cases of abuse, neglect, or dependency, the juvenile court need not make findings of fact to establish its jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“at the very beginning of the adjudication hearing that any evidence offered against [Stepmother] would be a violation of her due process rights based upon defective notice because she was not provided with notice that the State would seek to have findings entered against her, rather than father.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.