Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 262 P3D 874 - Jackson v. Unocal Corp.

Jackson v. Unocal Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
September 2023
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor · Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin · General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. Falcon · Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(Slo long as the trial court rigorously analyzes the evidence, it retains discretion to find to its satisfaction whether the evidence supports [class certification].”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “whether the plaintiff advances a theory by which to prove or disprove `an element on a simultaneous, class-wide basis, since such proof obviates the need to examine each class member's individual position.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “sufficiently definite so that it is administratively feasible for the court to determine whether a particular individual is a member [of the class]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.