Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

262 Pa. Super. 320

Commonwealth v. Butler

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 29, 1978

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1978-12-29

Relies on Commonwealth v. Greer · 252 Pa. Super. 103 - Commonwealth v. Liska

Decided 1978-12-29

PER CURIAM:

¶1AND NOW, this 29th day of December, 1978, the petition to withdraw is denied. Counsel for appellant is directed either (1) to file an amended request for leave to withdraw that meets in all respects the requirements of notice to the appellant, see Commonwealth v. Liska, 252 Pa.Super. 103, 380 A.2d 1303, 1306 (1977), and to file a withdrawal brief that meets the description in Commonwealth v. Greer, 455 Pa. 106, 108-09, 314 A.2d 513, 514-15 (1974), or (2) to proceed with the appeal by filing an advocate’s brief on the merits. In either case, counsel is to file a new brief and request, or new brief alone, within thirty (30) days, or risk sanctions.

SPAETH, J., files a dissenting statement, in which VAN der VOORT, J., joins.
/262/pasuper/320 · .json · Public domain