Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

262 S.C. 430

205 S.E.2d 174

Wiblen v. Long

Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1974-05-07

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1974-05-07

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently July 1992

3 state decisions

10197419801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam:

¶1 This is an appeal from a Writ of Mandamus issued by the Civil and Criminal Court of Horry County and directed to the Recorder of the City of Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. It is well settled in this jurisdiction that mandamus is the highest judicial writ known to the law and is issued only to enforce a clear legal right requiring the performance of only ministerial duties; and that an applicant for mandamus, to be entitled thereto, must show a duty upon respondent to perform the act, that the duty is ministerial in character, that the applicant has a specific right for which discharge of the duty is necessary, and that he has no'other remedy.. See cases collected in West’s South Carolina Digest, Mandamus, Key Nos. 1, 10 and 12.

¶2 Under these well settled principles of law it is clear that the Writ of Mandamus herein was erroneously issued and the judgment below is, accordingly,

¶3 Reversed.

/262/sc/430 · .json · Public domain