Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 262 SO2D 431 - State v. Barquet

State v. Barquet’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
July 2008
most recently cited

2 district · 35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2008 · most notably Roe v. Wade (1973), 280 So. 2d 431 - Hoffman v. Jones (1973)

2 district · 35 state decisions

3001972198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. State of New Jersey · Magna Oil Corp. v. Bateson · Watkins v. United States · Raley v. Ohio · United States v. Vuitch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The holding in this decision is available to those defendants who have . sought timely review by appeal from an adjudication of guilt, as of the filing date of this opinion.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““If a statute in defining a criminal offense omits certain necessary and essential provisions which serve to impress the acts committed as being wrongful and criminal, the courts are not at liberty to supply the deficiencies or undertake to make the statute definite and certain.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Although similar statutes may be held valid by the United States Supreme Court, it does not necessarily follow that they are valid under the state constitution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.