¶1Crichton, J., would grant and assigns reasons.
¶2*888I would grant the defendant's writ application as it relates to the issue of the admissibility of the testimony of Matthew Larsen, for the reasons set forth in Judge Perret's dissent.
262 So. 3d 887
Decided January 28, 2019
Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 2019-01-28
Decided 2019-01-28
¶1Crichton, J., would grant and assigns reasons.
¶2*888I would grant the defendant's writ application as it relates to the issue of the admissibility of the testimony of Matthew Larsen, for the reasons set forth in Judge Perret's dissent.