Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

262 S.W.2d 55

Docket No. 43577.

Townsend v. Lawrence

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 9, 1953.

Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1953-11-09

Relies on State Ex Rel. Edie v. Shain · Ballenger v. Windes · Gibbany v. Walker

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1953-11-09

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 1979

15 state decisions

80195319601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1J. William Cook, Crane, for appellant.

¶2Rufe Scott, Galena, for respondent.

¶3BOHLING, Commissioner.

¶4This is an action in ejectment for the possession of real estate in Stone County, Missouri. Plaintiff, alleging ownership, seeks possession, $100 damages and $1 a month rent. Defendant answered denying the allegations of plaintiff's petition, alleging ownership, and asked to be discharged with his costs. Neither party sought an adjudication of title. The judgment was that plaintiff take nothing and that defendant be discharged with his costs. It did not adjudge title in plaintiff or defendant.

¶5Plaintiff, upon his appeal, says we have jurisdiction because title to real estate is involved. No authority is cited. Ejectment is a possessory action. Under our rulings title to real estate is only incidentally or collaterally involved in the instant case and appellate jurisdiction is in the Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals may properly inquire into the matter of title when incidentally involved as the basis of a claim to possession. Ballenger v. Windes, 338 Mo. 1039, 93 S.W.2d 882, 883[2-4]; Gibbany v. Walker, 342 Mo. 156, 113 S.W.2d 792; State ex rel. Edie v. Shain, 348 Mo. 119, 152 S.W.2d 174, 176[1-3]; Hinkle v. Wood, Mo., 155 S.W.2d 191; Motchar v. Hollingsworth, Mo., 162 S.W.2d 805, 807[2-5]; 17 Mo.L.R. 103.

¶6The cause is transferred to the Springfield Court of Appeals.

¶7*56 WESTHUES and BARRETT, CC., concur.

¶8PER CURIAM.

¶9The foregoing opinion by BOHLING, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court.

¶10All concur.

/262/sw2d/55 · .json · Public domain