Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 262 SW2D 854 - Schaeffer v. Moore

Schaeffer v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
November 2009
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently November 2009 · most notably Allison v. Mildred (1957), Johnson v. Stull (1957)

28 state decisions

90195319601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Casper v. Lee · Conrad v. Diehl. · Jones v. McGonigle · Hope v. Blair · Johnson v. McAboy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Laches in legal significance, is not merely delay but delay that works a disadvantage to another. So long as parties are in the same condition, it matters little whether one presses a right promptly or slowly, within the limits allowed by law”.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.