Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

262 U.S. 65

43 S. Ct. 494

67 L. Ed. 865

Docket Nos. 372, 373.

United States v. Mossel

Full caption · 2 consolidated cases

  • UNITED STATESv.MOSSEL
  • SAMEv.MILFORD

Supreme Court of the United States

Argued April 10, 1923.

April 23, 1923

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1923-04-23

2 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Luskey

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · 9–0 · Opinion by Joseph McKenna · Decided 1923-04-23

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions (8 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2011 · most notably Adams Mfg Co v. Storen (1938), Department of Revenue v. Ass'n of Washington Stevedoring Companies (1978)

11 federal appellate · 28 state decisions — followed in 10 states

1101923193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

The Attorney General and Mr. James A. Fowler, of Knoxville, Tenn., for the United States.

Mr. George A. King, of Washington, D. C. for appellees.

Mr. Justice McKENNA delivered the opinion of the Court.

¶1

Under stipulation of counsel, filed in the clerk's office, the above cases are submitted on the record as printed in United States v. Harry W. Luskey (No. 371) 262 U. S. 62, 43 Sup. Ct. 493, 67 L. Ed. ——, just decided, 'it being agreed by counsel that they shall be controlled by the decision in that case.'

¶2

Therefore, upon its authority, the judgments in these cases are

¶3

Affirmed.

/262/us/65 · .json · Public domain