Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 262 WIS 540 - Conway v. Marachowsky

Conway v. Marachowsky’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 1975
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Morgan v. . Bon Bon Co. · Pratt v. Oshkosh Match Co. · Hinkley v. Sagemiller · Meyers v. Wells · Samuel Meyers, Inc. v. Ogden Shoe Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““121.04 Statute of frauds. (1) A contract to sell or a sale of any goods or choses in action of the value of fifty dollars or upwards shall not be enforceable by action unless the buyer shall accept part of the goods or choses in action so contracted to be sold or sold, and actually receive the same, or give something in earnest to bind the contract, or in part payment, or unless some note or memorandum in writing of the contract or sale be signed by the party to be charged or his agent in that behalf.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““No corporation shall issue any stock other than dividend stock, except in consideration of money or of labor or property estimated at its true money value, actually received by it, equal to the par value thereof, . . . and all stocks . . . issued contrary to the provisions of law . . . shall be void.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.