Logan v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
December 1981
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Peaslee · State v. Charette · Smith v. State · State v. Wilson · State v. Doran
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[t]o satisfy the demands of our State and Federal constitutional provisions [Constitution of Maine, Article I § 6; the Sixth-Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States] and of our Rule 7(c) of the Maine Rules of Criminal Procedure, the indictment must contain such plain, concise and definite allegations of the essential facts constituting the intended offense as shall adequately apprise an accused of reasonable and normal intelligence of the criminal act charged and the nature thereof, sufficiently enabling him to defend and, upon conviction or acquittal, to make use of the judgment as a basis of a plea of former jeopardy, should the occasion arise.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Thibodeau““[A]ll that is required is that an accused be informed in the indictment with that reasonable degree of fullness which would enable him to meet the exact charge against him. “If the allegations, we said, in their totality, supplied all the necessary aver-ments, either positively or by necessary implication, a defendant could not be misled and the identity of the offense charged would be clear.” (Emphasis in original). Ellis , Id. at 439, 440 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Thibodeau““Even though the terms ‘lawful custody’ and ‘lawful detention’, . . . may be viewed as legal conclusions, they are not meaningless. They convey to the accused the sense that his custody or detention was acquired in accordance with the provisions of law applicable to the circumstances recited in the indictment.” ( 263 A.2d at 269 )”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Tibbetts
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.