¶1Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. *929All concur, except Dowling, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and for granting a new trial on the authority of Moore v. Nye (21 N. Y. Supp. 94; 66 Hun, 628 [3d Dept.]; affd., 142 N. Y. 677); Umfreville v. Keeler (1 T. & C. 486 [4th Dept.]); Rich v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co. (87 N. Y. 382); Adams v. Gillig (199 id. 314); Ochs v. Woods (221 id. 335); Hobaica v. Byrne (216 App. Div. 307, 309), and Bowery National Bank v. Duncan (12 Hun, 405, 408). (The judgment dismisses the complaint in an action to recover damage for alleged fraud and misrepresentation. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ.
263 A.D. 928
Hyde v. Raduns
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 7, 1942
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1942-01-07
Relies on Rich v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad · Carpenter v. . Knapp
Decided 1942-01-07