¶1Order unanimously affirmed on the ground that respondent, James R. Capaldo, is not one chargeable with the legal duty to support petitioner under subdivision 4 of section 101 of the Domestic Relations Court Act of the City of New York. Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
263 A.D. 984
Capaldo v. Capaldo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 27, 1942
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1942-03-27
Decided 1942-03-27