Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 263 Ark. 554 - State v. Osborn

State v. Osborn’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
1
states following
June 2005
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 53 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently June 2005 · most notably Davis v. State (2003), Wright v. State (1979)

2 federal appellate · 53 state decisions

2001978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bates v. State Bar · City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey · Sobell v. Attorney General · Degler v. State · 76 Wis. 2d 457 - Bies v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e have given considerable weight to the findings of the trial judge in the resolution of evidentiary conflicts. [Harris v. State, 244 Ark. 314 , 425 S.W.2d 293 (1968).] We must defer to the superior position of the trial judge to pass upon the credibility of witnesses. Whitmore v. State, 263 Ark. 419 , 565 S.W.2d 733 (1978).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Davis v. State · Davis v. State
  2. “The trial court stated that, since the officers were not making or attempting to make an arrest, and that there was no emergency after the officer’s original entry into the mobile home, and no reason to believe that any contraband in the place would disappear while a search warrant was being obtained, the seizure was unconstitutional.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Dever v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.