Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

263 Conn. 920

State v. Hatch

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 2, 2003

Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 2003-05-02

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 2011

10 state decisions

Relies on State v. Hatch

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-05-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 75 Conn. App. 615 (AC 22164), is granted, limited to the following issues:

¶2“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant’s guilty plea was invalid because the trial court did not inform him, at the time of the plea, that his contemplated period of probation would require compliance with special conditions?

¶3“2. If the answer to the first question is ‘yes,’ did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court should have advised the defendant, at the sentencing, that he should consider withdrawing his plea?”

¶4NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

/263/conn/920 · .json · Public domain