Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 263 F.1d 366 - Demotte v. Whybrow

Demotte v. Whybrow’s Empirical Analysis

263 F. 366 · 1920

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
November 1946
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1946

14 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

120192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on David Lupton's Sons Company v. Automobile Club of America · Faber v. . City of New York · Boogher v. Insurance Co. · Finlen v. Heinze · Parks v. Elmore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The test is not whether the demand is liquidated. Was the plaintiff entitled to a certain sum? Should the defendant have paid it? Could the latter have determined what was due, either by computations alone or by computation in connection with established market values, or other generally recognized standards ?””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.