Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 263 F.1d 588 - Davis v. Willey

Davis v. Willey’s Empirical Analysis

263 F. 588 · 1920

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2025

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

4019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wood v. Carpenter · Burke v. Maguire · Truett v. Onderdonk · Bills v. Silver King Mining Co. · In re Mullen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is well established that the effect of this section (§ 70e) is to clothe the trustee with no new or additional right in the premises over that possessed by a creditor, but simply puts him in the shoes of the latter, and subject to the same limitations and disabilities that would have beset the creditor in the prosecution of the action on his own behalf ; and the rights of the parties are to he determined, not by any provision of the Bankruptcy Act, hut by the applicable principles of the common lam, or the lams of the state in mhich the right of action may arise. In other words, the Bankruptcy Act merely permits the trustee to assert the rights which the creditor could assert but for the pendency of the bankruptcy proceedings, . . (emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.