Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 263 F.1d 639 - Duncan v. Shelly

Duncan v. Shelly’s Empirical Analysis

263 F. 639 · 1920

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
February 1932
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on 31 App. D.C. 619 - Howard v. Bowes · Brown v. Campbell · Hubbard v. Berg · Curtain Supply Co. v. National Lock Washer Co. · Gordon v. Wentworth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is the settled doctrine of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia that when an inventor perfects and reduces to practice an invention, and fails for an unreasonable period to take steps to give it to the public, and until some one else has independently invented and patented it, the earlier inventor forfeits his rights to a patent as against the later inventor.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.