Dahlgren v. Pierce’s Empirical Analysis
263 F. 841 · 1920
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently July 2018
8 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Western Loan Savings Company v. Butte & Boston Consolidated Mining Company · Ladew v. Tennessee Copper Co. · Charles Chase v. Emil Wetzlar J · Jones v. Andrews · Citizens' Savings Trust Company v. Illinois Central Railroad Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The question of general appearance is one of intent, actual or implied, and where the whole purpose of defendant’s application to the court is to set aside an order because it has been made without personal jurisdiction over him, the conduct which will make the application unavailing and destroy its basis must be clear and unequivocal.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ervin v. Quintanilla
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.