Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 263 F.1d 893 - Shapley v. Cohoon

Shapley v. Cohoon’s Empirical Analysis

263 F. 893 · 1920

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
February 1925
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Ex parte Tracy · Raton Water Works Co. v. City of Raton · American Electric Welding Co. v. Lalance & Grosjean Mfg. Co. · Blumenstock Bros. Advertising Agency v. Curtis Pub. Co. · Shapley v. Cohoon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The axiomatic rule that courts should at once dismiss proceedings from their control whenever, and however, want of jurisdiction is seen — whether upon motion, or upon their own discovery, at whatever stage of the proceedings the discovery may be made — is quite as imperative as the other well-understood rule that requires courts to be jealous and alert in holding and protecting their proper jurisdiction. Holding a case after discovery of want of jurisdiction would be delaying and obstructing justice, not administering it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.