Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 263 F.2d 182 - Olson v. Maxwell

Olson v. Maxwell’s Empirical Analysis

263 F.2d 182 · 1959

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 1982
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 1982

6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

401959196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 4

Relies on Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago River & Indiana Railroad · Kendrick v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad · Cain v. Steely · Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United States ex rel. Reischel & Cottrell · Lawrence v. Kansas Power & Light Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In considering a demurrer to the evidence, the court shall disregard all evidence which is unfavorable to the plaintiff and shall consider all of his evidence as true, together with the reasonable inferences which may be drawn therefrom. It shall not weigh the contradictory evidence or any differences in plaintiff's testimony on direct and cross examination. Cain v. Steely, 173 Kan. 866, 252 P.2d 909, and cases cited.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.