Beale v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
263 F.2d 215 · 1959
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently April 1997 · most notably United States v. Joseph A. Chase, United States of America v. Robert H. Parrish, United States of America v. Wyatt J. Roy, Jr. (1967), United States v. Marchisio (1965)
26 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brasfield v. United States · United States v. Antonelli Fireworks Co. · Bowen v. United States · Bowen v. United States · Tomoya Kawakita v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the trial judge was actuated by solicitude for the jury, to arrange a suitable luncheon hour, and not by a desire to pry into or influence their deliberation. This and the short time the jury deliberated over its verdict distinguish the case from Brasfield and from most of the decisions holding that the inquiry was reversible error”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“it's about time for you to eat; I want to check before our noon recess”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.