William Gart v. Albert M. Cole’s Empirical Analysis
263 F.2d 244 · 1959
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 6 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently August 2007 · most notably Core v. Norwalk Redevelopment Agency (1968), 61 Cal. 2d 21 - In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. Goldman (1964)
26 federal appellate · 6 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cantwell v. State of Connecticut · Hansberry v. Lee · Massachusetts v. Mellon · Everson v. Board of Education · Angel v. Bullington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“designed to protect not the interests of landowners or tenants in a redevelopment area, but those of the public at large,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“as representatives of so broad an interest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.