Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 263 F.2d 342 - L. Nachman & Son, Inc. v. E. Lasner, Inc.

L. Nachman & Son, Inc. v. E. Lasner, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

263 F.2d 342 · 1959

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
November 1971
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 1971

2 federal appellate ·

100195919601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Application of Myers · Crown Overall Mfg. Co. v. Desmond's · Princess Pat, Ltd. v. Tursi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In cases such as the instant one, where there are specific differences in both the marks and the goods involved, all the differences must be taken into consideration. In re Myers, [Etc.,] 201 F.2d 379 , 40 C.C.P. A. 747; Princess Pat, Ltd. v. Tursi, 230 F.2d 440 , 43 C.C.P.A. 795.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.