Murray v. De Vito

Argued Jan. 26, 1959.

Decided Feb. 5, 1959.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1959

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1959-02-05

¶1Mr. Denis K. Lane, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

¶2Mr. Herman Miller, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. H. Nathaniel Blau-stein, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellee.

¶3Before Edgerton, Bazelon, and Bas-tían, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Appellee recovered a money judgment against appellant for excluding him from certain premises. We find no error.

¶6Affirmed.