Patricia G. Brooks v. Mary J. Maholm

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Jan. 13, 1959. Decided Jan. 29, 1959.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1959-01-29

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 1964

4 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Brooks v. De Lacy

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1959-01-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mr. Ward B. McCarthy, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. George C. Vournas, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. Robert H. McNeill, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before PRETTYMAN, Chief Judge, and BAZELON and WASHINGTON, Circuit judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Following our decision in Brooks v. DeLacy, 1958, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 223, 257 F.2d 227, the District Court revoked the appointment of Mr. DeLacy, and appointed the widow of the decedent as administratrix. We find no abuse of discretion.

¶2

Affirmed.