Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 263 F.3d 1164 - John Mathews v. The Denver Post -

John Mathews v. The Denver Post -’s Empirical Analysis

263 F.3d 1164 · 2001

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. C.R. England, Inc. (2011), Hennagir v. Utah Department of Corrections (2009)

11 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

130200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Board of Trustees of the University of Alabamas v. Patricia Garrett · Anderson v. Coors Brewing Co. · Smith v. Midland Brake, Inc. · Milton v. Scrivner, Inc. · Steven Martin v. State of Kansas United States of America Colorado Cross Disability Coalition the Legal Center for People with Disabilities and Older People

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In this en banc appeal, we are required to answer two questions concerning the [ADA]. First, whether an employee can be a "qualified individual with a disability" when that employee is unable to perform the essential functions of his or her present job, regardless of the level of accommodation offered, but could perform the essential functions of other available jobs within the company with or without a reasonable accommodation. The answer to that question, we find, is yes. Second, if a person is a "qualified individual with a disability" and a reasonable accommodation is not available to enable that employee to perform the essential functions of his or her existing job, what is the scope of the employer's obligation to offer that employee a reassignment job?”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.